19 Apr
Whither Privacy?
I have nobody for my own
I am so lonely, I’m Mr. Lonely
Wish I had someone to call on the phone
Letters, never a letter
I get no letters in the mail.
I’ve been forgotten, yes, forgotten.
Oh how I wonder, how is it I failed?
Mr. Lonely by Bobby Vinton
There are loads more songs about loneliness and isolation, all of which are a testament to mankind’s innate need to be social. That has been increasingly difficult in recent years, especially here in Jakarta with its gridlock. It is little wonder that many gravitate to their local den of consumerism, not that many buy. They are places to see and be seen: there’s the illusion that you’re never alone in a crowd.

Sales of Strand cigarettes were poor and they were soon taken off the market. The public associated smoking with being lonely and were put off from buying them, even though ‘lonely’ and ‘alone’ are different concepts. Some of us don’t crave crowds, or cigarettes, and are content with our own company.
This frequently updated blog may indicate otherwise, but I don’t have a herd instinct. Assuming you are a regular reader here, then consider yourself to be privileged, because you are privy to my thoughts and obsessions.
[The first known use of 'privy' was in the 14th century; it was derived from the Anglo-French privé, which in turn came from the Latin privatus, meaning private. As a noun, it originally referred to toilets, and as such remains in colloquial English.]
It is the concept of privacy which exercises me at present, a notion that we are entitled to our secrets.

The UK
Back in the 70′s and 80′s in the UK, we didn’t have mobile phones, emails or online social networks, so our anti-establishment activities were planned, not by voicemail but by male (and female) voices, often in closed meetings. Because there were laws forbidding ”interference with Her Majesty’s mail” – all mail in transit being considered as belonging to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II until it was/is delivered to the intended recipient – snail mail was a means of communication with those we wanted to keep in the loop but who were out of reach.
A more recent Postal Services Act 2000 presumably – I haven’t read the small print – outlines procedures and regulations regarding the state’s authority to open someone’s mail if it is considered necessary to prevent a crime or there are “national security” issues.
Still in the UK, telephone tapping was until 1985 covered by the Interception of Communications Act. However, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg said surveillance procedures provided inadequate protection against abuses of power. The Act was replaced by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act in 2000.
Interception of a communication is allowed in the interests of national security, for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime and for the purpose of safeguarding the economic well-being of the United Kingdom.
Apart from those ‘in authority’, national security is a nebulous concept for we mere mortals, and there are few of us who know what constitutes a crime against the state.
And there are few of us who know when the state commits a crime against us or indeed what it is.
Just this week, we learn that documents related to “some of the most shameful acts and crimes committed during the final years of the British empire were systematically destroyed to prevent them falling into the hands of post-independence governments.“
For example, newly released documents reveal that during the Malayan Emergency (1948 to 1960) British officials in Kuala Lumpur interpreted virtually all anti-colonial protests as evidence of a planned communist takeover. The colonial overlords therefore operated a system of ‘elimination’ of communists.
Read the chilling story of how secret justice cost a couple their £5m home – and £700m business through the machinations of ‘secrecy laws’. Note that this story is published by the Daily Mail, generally a supporter of the Britain’s Conservative Party which is behind a proposed law, Communications Capabilities Development Programme (CCDP).
Much of the detail has not been released, but there are suggestions that CCDP could involve two different systems. The first would involve ISPs intercepting webmail, social media and forum chat, and storing the data showing who talks to whom and when. Much of the surveillance technology is already being exported to repressive régimes which monitor dissident groups.
The second proposal would allow the police to gain access to the same “communications data” from big web companies. They would be able to get this data without a warrant but merely by a police officer signing a form.
Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who devised the World Wide Web, now serves as an adviser to the government on how to make public data more accessible. He says that the extension of the state’s surveillance powers would be a “destruction of human rights” and would make a huge amount of highly intimate information vulnerable to theft or release by corrupt officials.
“The amount of control you have over somebody if you can monitor internet activity is amazing. You get to know every detail, you get to know, in a way, more intimate details about their life than any person that they talk to because often people will confide in the internet as they find their way through medical websites … or as an adolescent finds their way through a website about homosexuality, wondering what they are and whether they should talk to people about it.
“The idea that we should routinely record information about people is obviously very dangerous. It means that there will be information around which could be stolen, which can be acquired through corrupt officials or corrupt operators.”
Indonesia – take note!
Indonesia
Retired Admiral Sudomo’s death yesterday brings a renewed focus on the secretive operations and crimes against Indonesians committed by Suharto’s military regime, and, as Sudomo admitted in an interview, the role played by the CIA in the genocide of 65/66.
From 17th April 1978 to 29th March 1983, Sudomo was commander of Kopkamtib, an acronym for Komando Operasi Pemulihan Keamanan dan Ketertiban or ‘Operational Command for the Restoration of Security and Order’, which was a secret police operation in Suharto’s ‘New Order’ that continued issues arising from the transition to the New Order, including “surveillance of citizens”.
From 1983 to 1988 he was the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration. He was then appointed as Suharto’s Coordinating Minister for Political Affairs and Security, a post he held until 1993.
He thus effectively kept two beady eyes on Indonesia’s downtrodden masses for fifteen years. There are many with long memories who will not mourn his passing, yet as I post this online, he is being interred in Kalibata Heroes Cemetery.
One can only wonder how he would have used the internet.
Law 11 of 2008 Electronic Information and Transactions Indonesia (.pdf) broadened the authority of the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCI) to include supervision of the flow of information and possible censorship of online content. Obviously this involves an element of filtering with ISPs being tasked with blocking access to certain sites. There is a distinct religious fundamentalism at work here, with Law No. 44 of 2008 on Pornography setting the boundaries of what may be viewed online.
This is what your browser will display if a site is blocked.*

Last year the government forced Blackberry maker Canadian company Research in Motion Ltd (RIM) to set up a pornography internet filter in Indonesia. What is perhaps more sinister is that RIM complied with several other requests from the government, including building a server in Indonesia so authorities could “conduct investigations against perpetrators of crime.”
Electronic ID card
For the past couple of years, the government has been developing an electronic identity card system. Not unexpectedly, the programme has been marked by a lack of co-ordination between the central government and local offices mandated to process the citizenry: the deadline, the end of this year, will net be met.
Now comes news that the National Police Criminal Investigation Division has launched the Indonesia Automatic Fingerprint Identification System (Inafis) “aimed at improving its services”.
According to National Police detective chief Comr. Gen. Sutarman, the card will also contain information about its holder’s bank account, certificates of house ownership and criminal records.
“The data will be saved on a centralized computer server and will be combined with information gathered in the development of the government’s e-ID system.”
The head of the police’s Inafis center, Brig. Gen. Bekti Suhartono, said that Inafis will not overlap with the government’s e-ID program, as the system was geared toward helping the police deal with criminal cases.
“A simple example would be when dealing with a person who has just violated a traffic rule. With Inafis in place, the person doesn’t have to give his fine to the court. The state can automatically withdraw the amount from his or her bank account.”
That’s tantamount to giving a fox free range in the chicken house!
What is clear is that as citizens we should have the individual right to know what information about us is stored by authorities. There should also be the right of reply and/or redaction.
Take action
How can we tell whether a request for an extension of powers is a reasonable demand or simply another case of bureaucratic empire-building at the expense of liberty?
Or is it at the behest of internet behomoths such as Facebook and Google seeking to monetise the vast amounts of data they hold on all of us online?
Shield your computers and mobile devices with any number of adblockers, malware shields, firewalls, spam filters ….
In the UK: The Open Rights Group, based in London, exists to preserve and promote rights in the digital age.
Sign their petition.
In the USA
Avaaz.org relates how over 100 Members of Congress are backing the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) that would give private companies and the US government the right to spy on any of us at any time for as long as they want without a warrant.
Those of us whose websites are hosted on USA servers – yes, including Jakartass – who communicate online with American friends, family and business associates via the World Wide Web, would not be immune from surveillance.
Sign the Avaaz petition.

………………………………………………………………………………………………….
*Unfortunately, this means that I can’t access the recording of an interview I gave the BBC in 2007 about Jakarta’s floods. If you’re keen to hear my dulcet tones, I’ve since uploaded it here.)


















The Last Five Comments