20 Nov
Letter: Narcissistic politicians
I added a comment to my 'interview' with the Twittering Simplefool. Writing as an amateur psychologist, I attempted to explain his oft-times odd behaviour. I'm not particularly fond of psychoanalytical meanderings and I'd never accept another's hangups being hung on me. However, as well as his twitterrhoea it does appear to me that TS has an Oedipus complex.
In classical theory, people who are fixated at the Oedipal level are 'mother-fixated' or 'father-fixated', and reveal this by choosing sexual partners who are discernible surrogates for their parent(s).
Freud posited that boys and girls resolved the conflicts differently as a result of the male's castration anxiety (caused by Oedipal rivalry with the father) and the female's penis envy. He also held that the unsuccessful resolution of the Oedipus complex could result in neurosis, paedophilia, and homosexuality.
In a coherent letter to the Jakarta Post this week, friend and former colleague John Hargreaves offered a different analysis of what makes TS tick, and what gives the rest of us tics.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
From a psychological approach, the statement made by Communications and Information Technology Minister Tifatul Sembiring in connection with his shaking of hands with US First Lady Michelle Obama can be considered as narcissistic.
This description is from Erich Fromm’s The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness.
“Only he himself and what pertains to him has significance … and because of this double standard the narcissistic person shows severe defects in judgment and lacks the capacity for objectivity. Often the narcissistic person achieves a sense of security in his own entirely subjective conviction of his perfection, his superiority over others, his extraordinary qualities...”
This sort of personality is well-suited to people in professions with celebrity status, including politics, where he can be surrounded by fawning admirers, who are oblivious to their hero’s lack of genuine conviction or real accomplishments.
Since a narcissist politician will be considered insufferably vain if he merely proclaims his own personal brilliance, he creates, or appropriates, a group or ideology, building a symbiotic relationship with his followers.
As Fromm points out, “fostering group narcissism is very inexpensive from the standpoint of the social budget; in fact, it costs practically nothing compared with the social expense required to raise the standard of living.”
An historic, Indonesian example is Sukarno. Besides recruiting a stream of submissive women to gratify his personal narcissism, he showed a narcissistic orientation in his vision of Indonesia, promoting aggrieved slogans such as “Crush Malaysia” and “To hell with your aid” rather than pursue welfare policies that would have required him to confront economic reality.
Of course Tifatul has none of Sukarno’s greatness, but he has a very potent channel for group identity.
What are the practical implications of all this?
One is that many urban Indonesians, who are severed from their roots in the soil, from creative opportunity and from economic prospects, will seek new roots in group identity. If leaders fail to offer a vision of Indonesia founded on realism, inclusiveness and tolerance, then many people will succumb to visions founded in narcissistic self-deception, exclusiveness and intolerance.
A second is that education should promote reason, realistic observation, critical thought and imagination, rather than peddling illusions of certainty.
Fromm again: “From an educated guess, to a hypothesis, to a theory, an ever increasing approximation of certainty exists mediated by reason, realistic observation, critical thought and imagination. For the one who has these capacities, relative uncertainty is very acceptable because it is the result of the active use of his faculties, while certainty is boring because it is dead. But for those without these faculties… the fanatic who pretends to be certain becomes a most attractive figure, somebody akin to a savior.”
John Hargreaves
Jakarta
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
I have often suggested to John that he should archive his letters online. That he hasn't (yet?) is why I offer no apologies for reproducing his latest missive here.
J















The Last Five Comments