10 Jun
Research
A lot of what you read here is the result of diligent research. Something I read or think about can set off a train of thought which leads me to hitherto unsuspected information and possible solutions to life's dilemmas.
Take the issue of Jakarta's traffic woes.
Today's Post informed us that the previously unheard of Presidential Work Unit for Development Monitoring and Control (UKP4) has given the Jakarta administration a failing grade in its implementation of 17 plans of action designed to ease Jakarta’s worsening traffic.
UKP4 head Kuntoro Mangkusubroto said, "“If you ask me, the progress in the 17 plans, I will have to say that it is bad news … and why is it so hard to put them into action? The root of the problem is that there’s no coordination at all.”
17 plans? That many? Apart from a couple of elevated roads causing immense jams, the truck ban on toll roads through the city, the opening of a couple of long-delayed Busway routes, the opening of a kilometre and a half of bike lane from nowhere to somewhere unimportant and …. what are the other 13?
I don't think it's that difficult to come up with a simple solution or two.
How about providing safe unobstructed pavements – or sidewalks if you prefer – for pedestrians?
Ah, but that's too easy by half/
My researches have lead me to this bit of research pertaining to the Tokyo rail system.
Transport networks are ubiquitous in both social and biological systems. Robust network performance involves a complex trade-off involving cost, transport efficiency, and fault tolerance. Biological networks have been honed by many cycles of evolutionary selection pressure and are likely to yield reasonable solutions to such combinatorial optimization problems. Furthermore, they develop without centralized control and may represent a readily scalable solution for growing networks in general.
We show that the slime mold Physarum polycephalum forms networks with comparable efficiency, fault tolerance, and cost to those of real-world infrastructure networks—in this case, the Tokyo rail system. The core mechanisms needed for adaptive network formation can be captured in a biologically inspired mathematical model that may be useful to guide network construction in other domains.
"Slime mold"? Thats' a good description of City Hall bureaucrats if ever I heard one.
That thought lead me to research whether swearing is actually good for you. The answer is that of course it fucking is, especially when in pain.
Although a common pain response, whether swearing alters individuals' experience of pain has not been investigated. This study investigated whether swearing affects cold-pressor pain tolerance (the ability to withstand immersing the hand in icy water), pain perception and heart rate. In a repeated measures design, pain outcomes were assessed in participants asked to repeat a swear word versus a neutral word. In addition, sex differences and the roles of pain catastrophising, fear of pain and trait anxiety were explored.
Swearing increased pain tolerance, increased heart rate and decreased perceived pain compared with not swearing. However, swearing did not increase pain tolerance in males with a tendency to catastrophise. The observed pain-lessening (hypoalgesic) effect may occur because swearing induces a fight-or-flight response and nullifies the link between fear of pain and pain perception.
Continuing my delve into clinical trials i came across the Barf Scale, which we Brits call the Puke Portraits.

Of course it wouldn't be a clinical trial if the resulting report was in plain language.
This pictorial (Baxter Retching Faces) scale for measuring nausea severity has convergent and discriminant validity, and detected change after antiemetic treatment. Its use in the clinical and research setting may assist in nausea management in children…. To our knowledge, this is the first scale based in part on patient drawings.
Additional studies will be required to determine if the stylized emesis anchor will decrease endorsement of the maximum nausea choice by patients with severe nausea but no emesis, based on concrete thinking that ‘If I am not actually vomiting, I cannot choose this face’….
Future studies need to be performed to determine if there are age, gender, culture, ethnic, or language variations in the validation of the BARF scale.
I started out to write a post about the endemic corruption among the world's football authorities, having read the following: The president of the Barbados Football Association, Ronald Jones, has insisted neither he nor his officials were not offered bribes by Bin Hamman or Jack Warner.
I'm sure there's a story there somewhere, if I can get my head around it. But I'm sufficiently boggled for one day, thank you.












The Last Five Comments